For those that have been in Rip Van Winkle status, here is a recap of a current news story that has been active for almost seven years.
News Flash:
US invades Afghanistan to remove Taliban from power.
Anti-War Crowd's Response:
We can't win in Afghanistan.
News Flash:
US invades Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
Anti-War Crowd's Response:
We can't win in Iraq.
News Flash:
US sustains losses in Iraq campaign.
Anti-War Crowd's Response:
See? We told you so. We can't win in Iraq.
News Flash:
US to employ troop surge to curb Iraqi violence.
Anti-War Crowd's Response:
Won't work, we can't win in Iraq.
News Flash:
Violence decreases in Iraq, increases in Afghanistan.
Anti-War Crowd's Response:
We can't win in Afghanistan.
4 comments:
Here's another area where BHO is going to have issues. What's he to say about Afghanistan? That we need a surge? Like the one that worked in Iraq? The one he wrongly opposed? Fool. The only thing he can say that makes sense is that McCain was right on Iraq, and we need to do the same thing in Afghanistan. So, he'll just have to not make sense.
Good opinion piece from National Review.
http://tinyurl.com/6qyyks
And here's an article on exactly how BHO is dealing with the success of the strategy he opposed. Hint: it's with "change."
http://tinyurl.com/5mezvo
//Hint: it's with "change."//
When in doubt, "change" the website. Good find, Greg.
Post a Comment