lol. well, he certainly is often 'transparent', i.e. very thin on substance and principal. unlike a lot of anti-obama people, i don't see the Prez as an ideologue. he's just the most cynical president of my lifetime. i don't think he believes in anything except himself.
AC....I have been reluctant to pick because I stunk so bad last week. I can tell you that my dislike of the Steelers goes back 35 years, when they were in their heyday.
I am pulling for the Bears but I have a funny feeling that the Pack will win it because this could be Rodgers' moment to shine. And....it's hard to pick against the Jets after beating Manning and Brady on back to back weeks.
But in reality, i think any of the four remaining teams is capable of winning it all. I know, I know, I should be in politics with that answer, right?
4 comments:
lol. well, he certainly is often 'transparent', i.e. very thin on substance and principal. unlike a lot of anti-obama people, i don't see the Prez as an ideologue. he's just the most cynical president of my lifetime. i don't think he believes in anything except himself.
//he certainly is often 'transparent', i.e. very thin on substance and principal.//
Can't say we didn't see right through him, during the 08 campaign.
Sadly funny.
OK, what are your picks for the weekend, LA?
AC....I have been reluctant to pick because I stunk so bad last week. I can tell you that my dislike of the Steelers goes back 35 years, when they were in their heyday.
I am pulling for the Bears but I have a funny feeling that the Pack will win it because this could be Rodgers' moment to shine. And....it's hard to pick against the Jets after beating Manning and Brady on back to back weeks.
But in reality, i think any of the four remaining teams is capable of winning it all. I know, I know, I should be in politics with that answer, right?
Post a Comment