Click on the title for the full story from Neal Boortz.
I won't spoil the surprise. But suffice it to say, it does not surprise me one bit that the left has resorted to this kind of tactic. They did it throughout the election and they are continuing it. well after the fact. This story shows just how low the left is willing to go to promote its weak agenda.
MoveOn.Org is a den of liars and a haven for angry young people that cannot think for themselves, cannot form an objective opinion, and cannot produce one single solitary idea, as an alternative to the policies they so loudly decry. They only have the ability to train zombie-like leftist robots that follow whatever path the likes of George Soros and Michael Moore, leads them on.
They are unto themselves the worst kind of cult, that rivals that of the Moonies, Hare Krishnas, and other brainwashing organizations. From now on, they shall be known as MoveOn.Org, the quintessential political cult.
Read it for yourself and see what you think.
Saturday, July 09, 2005
Friday, July 08, 2005
Ward Churchill: At It Again (As Usual)
Eclipse Ramblings: Far Left Extremist College Professor calls for US troops to kill their officers
Mark has posted something on Ward Churchill, the idiot professor from the University of Colorado (well the biggest one anyway, he certainly isn't the only one). Click on the link to access it.
If I were little Wardy, I would try to get my money back from whatever university issued his doctorate. He definitely did not get a quality education. He did not get his money's worth.
Mark has posted something on Ward Churchill, the idiot professor from the University of Colorado (well the biggest one anyway, he certainly isn't the only one). Click on the link to access it.
If I were little Wardy, I would try to get my money back from whatever university issued his doctorate. He definitely did not get a quality education. He did not get his money's worth.
Unemployment Continues To Drop
Click on the title for the complete AP article.
So, the next time someone says tax cuts don't work, you will know different. Not that it is government's job to create jobs, but we can all see that having a pro business administration in the White House helps the job market. Somebody (somewhere) got a job in June. Don't let the leftists that protest everything (and whine because they can't find a job), tell you there are no jobs.
WASHINGTON - Hiring around the country picked up in June with employers adding 146,000 jobs — helping to push the unemployment rate down to 5 percent, the lowest in nearly four years.
So, the next time someone says tax cuts don't work, you will know different. Not that it is government's job to create jobs, but we can all see that having a pro business administration in the White House helps the job market. Somebody (somewhere) got a job in June. Don't let the leftists that protest everything (and whine because they can't find a job), tell you there are no jobs.
Some Weak And Faulty Comparisons Compliments Of The Daily Kos
Click on the title for the link to the Daily Kos, which is a liberal blog. This is what Kos posted for his Independence Day message. Let's examine it, shall we?
Could have fooled me.
Let's see, Dobson's position is what?
Is he the President? Is he Secretary of State, Defense, Homeland Security? Is he House Speaker or Senate Majority Leader? Is he the GOP party chairman? Does he hold any high ranking position in the GOP?
Answer: No, he is none of those.
So Kos starts off his post with very little credible information. Normally, that alone would be enough to cause me to click out of the site, but what fun would that be? Read on.
Funny how the wingers try to claim American liberals are in league with crazy fundamentalist Muslims.
Claim? I think it is quite evident. I don't need Republicans to tell me that the left has given aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. I don't need Republicans to tell me the left is full of apologists for the terrorists and appeasers of them.
Reality is, we hate everything Islamic fundamentalism stands for.
Could have fooled me.
On the other hand, the Dobson's of the Republican Party -- you know, the people running the show -- have far more in common with the enemy than they'd ever like to admit.
Let's see, Dobson's position is what?
Is he the President? Is he Secretary of State, Defense, Homeland Security? Is he House Speaker or Senate Majority Leader? Is he the GOP party chairman? Does he hold any high ranking position in the GOP?
Answer: No, he is none of those.
So Kos starts off his post with very little credible information. Normally, that alone would be enough to cause me to click out of the site, but what fun would that be? Read on.
Religion in government
Al Qaida/Taliban: One and the same
American Taliban: One and the same
Liberals: Separation of church and state
This a good one. Liberals want separation of Christianity and state. All others are okay. Besides that, when have you ever seen Jerry Falwell lop off someone's head? When have we ever seen Billy Graham order and/or direct the destruction of a nation that he despises?
Schools
Al Qaida/Taliban: Religious indoctrination. Run by clergy.American Taliban: School prayer. Religious indoctrination (creationism and "intelligent design"). Private religious school system.
Liberals: Leave religious teachings to parents and sunday school.
So, does having prayer in school really compare with the Al Qaida/Taliban's model of teaching jihad and the destruction of America and Israel?
Answer: It doesn't. It is a contrast, not a comparison.
Women
Al Qaida/Taliban: No school, must cover entire body, no rights.American Taliban: Government control over reproductive freedoms, hostility to Title IX, hostility to working women
Liberals: Equality of the sexes
Where have Republicans urged hostility towards working women? Where have they advocated the complete subjection and oppression of women, as the Taliban has?
Answer: Nowhere. This is just another illogical reasoning that liberals want to promote as a legitimate comparison.
Religious freedom
Al Qaida/Taliban: 'Think like us, or we'll whip you and/or chop off your head'
American Taliban: 'Think like us, or we'll condemn you to hell'
Liberals: To each her own
This is a laugher. In some respects Kos is right, in that some religious fanatics will say that if you don't believe the way they do, you will go to hell. But let's look at this intelligently. A person that condemns someone else to hell, has no power or authority to do so. Just because they say it, won't necessarily make it so. They can judge on the earth if they wish, but only God will have the final say.
On the other hand, when Al Qaida condemns someone to execution by beheading, they do make it so. They act as judge, jury, and executioner.
Homosexuality
Al Qaida/Taliban: Eradicate them from society
American Taliban: Eradicate them from society
Liberals: Equality under the law
Jerry Falwell and the likes have said some pretty stupid things before, but I have yet to see any of them say kill all homosexuals. Liberals, on the other hand, have a tendency to totally disrespect people's rights to not have homosexuality rammed down their throats.
Torture
Al Qaida/Taliban: Torture them or chop off their heads
American Taliban: Torture them or homosexually rape them.
Liberals: No torture
Liberals condemn the smallest of indiscretions like mishandling a book, yet they are conspicuously silent on the real barbarous acts displayed by the terrorists. Instead they want us to stop, reflect, and try to understand why these murderers want to hurt us.
Those of you that have read this blog with any regularity know that I am not a member of the religious right, and that I often disgree with their opinions on social issues. I am not a fan of the Falwell faction. But nowhere in this piece posted by Kos can I find any legitimacy in the weak and faulty criticisms, he tries to promote as valid.
I doubt most of my readers can, either.
What we do see is nothing more than another liberal that desperately seeks to rationalize his wrong thinking and justify it.
Hat Tip: powerpundit
Struggling For Words
Well, what can we say?
Here's what we can't say.
We cannot say that we are surprised. The warnings have been there, for years. The age of modern jihad began in 1979, when the Iranian thugs violated the sovereignty of the U.S. by illegally invading and occupying our embassy. At that moment the world watched to see what response the strongest nation in the world would give. We got appeasement.
If you haven't read "A Short History Of WWIII" by Sal Rosken at PartialObserver you seriously need to. It is quite a comprehensive list of just how many attacks that we as a nation have endured, after that first blow; it does not include those that have been directed against other countries, to include Israel. When you see just how many we have let go, for so long, it will cause you to ask why nothing was done sooner.
(Reagan made a menial effort. But he was more limited than we are today, because of the Cold War. The real next threat was brewing, while he was busy trying to beat the most formidable threat of that day, the USSR and its satellites.)
In the days leading up to WWII, we saw an out of control dictator threaten and take what he wanted, when he wanted it. Chamberlain negotiated and what did we get? That's right, appeasement. It was not until he spun so far out of control and plunged us into one of the bloodiest and destructive wars of all time, that the appeasers were finally convinced that the Nazis were, in fact, a true, bonafide threat that needed to be dealt with.
Today, we see the same kid gloves, the same measured responses, and the same appeasers tying the hands of those that must put everything on the line to defeat these bottom feeding, low-life Islamofascists. We also have seen today, the specific result of what happens if these people continue to be appeased.
So, what can I say?
How about this:
Have the leftists around the world seen enough? I really doubt it. But is there a liberal that has been so staunchly anti-American that may now be moved to at least sit on the fence and think about this a little deeper than you have , in the past? If so, think about this. Compare this day and age to that of the pre-WWII era and see if anything rings familar.
Is there someone that has been sitting on the fence that now has seen enough and is willing to admit, they have been too ambivalent about such a serious threat? If so, get off of the damned fence and get with the program. Start supporting what we are trying to do and start demanding that we do better.
If there is one criticism I have had for President Bush, it has to be, he has allowed these appeasing pacifists to tie his hands. He has been fighting a sensitive war and we all know there can never be such a thing, when total victory is needed. These bastards are not going to be impressed with anything we do to show our human sides, because being human to animals is an extremely ineffective strategy. They are not human, therefore they cannot respond as humans. To continue in this manner, is to accept defeat.
People around the world need to sit up and take notice, because this threat is not going to be averted, any more than Chamberlain brought back peace in his time.
Here's what we can't say.
We cannot say that we are surprised. The warnings have been there, for years. The age of modern jihad began in 1979, when the Iranian thugs violated the sovereignty of the U.S. by illegally invading and occupying our embassy. At that moment the world watched to see what response the strongest nation in the world would give. We got appeasement.
If you haven't read "A Short History Of WWIII" by Sal Rosken at PartialObserver you seriously need to. It is quite a comprehensive list of just how many attacks that we as a nation have endured, after that first blow; it does not include those that have been directed against other countries, to include Israel. When you see just how many we have let go, for so long, it will cause you to ask why nothing was done sooner.
(Reagan made a menial effort. But he was more limited than we are today, because of the Cold War. The real next threat was brewing, while he was busy trying to beat the most formidable threat of that day, the USSR and its satellites.)
In the days leading up to WWII, we saw an out of control dictator threaten and take what he wanted, when he wanted it. Chamberlain negotiated and what did we get? That's right, appeasement. It was not until he spun so far out of control and plunged us into one of the bloodiest and destructive wars of all time, that the appeasers were finally convinced that the Nazis were, in fact, a true, bonafide threat that needed to be dealt with.
Today, we see the same kid gloves, the same measured responses, and the same appeasers tying the hands of those that must put everything on the line to defeat these bottom feeding, low-life Islamofascists. We also have seen today, the specific result of what happens if these people continue to be appeased.
So, what can I say?
How about this:
Have the leftists around the world seen enough? I really doubt it. But is there a liberal that has been so staunchly anti-American that may now be moved to at least sit on the fence and think about this a little deeper than you have , in the past? If so, think about this. Compare this day and age to that of the pre-WWII era and see if anything rings familar.
Is there someone that has been sitting on the fence that now has seen enough and is willing to admit, they have been too ambivalent about such a serious threat? If so, get off of the damned fence and get with the program. Start supporting what we are trying to do and start demanding that we do better.
If there is one criticism I have had for President Bush, it has to be, he has allowed these appeasing pacifists to tie his hands. He has been fighting a sensitive war and we all know there can never be such a thing, when total victory is needed. These bastards are not going to be impressed with anything we do to show our human sides, because being human to animals is an extremely ineffective strategy. They are not human, therefore they cannot respond as humans. To continue in this manner, is to accept defeat.
People around the world need to sit up and take notice, because this threat is not going to be averted, any more than Chamberlain brought back peace in his time.
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
Congratulations To Britain
I am a bit disappointed for New York, I really thought they had a legitimate shot at it. But evidently, the committee (which is representative of the countries that vote) really do not have a lot respect for the one city that has been the single biggest melting pot (of all of the people that these countries didn't want, mind you) in the world. You would have a hard time convincing me that there is another country that has a city that has welcomed the tired, the poor, the hungry with any more open arms, than NYC.
But hey, the good news (besides saving a bunch of money on my car insurance with Geico) is Paris did not get it. They are no doubt ready to blame the United States and President Bush in some kind of far-fetched (and wrongly perceived) conspiracy.
But a hearty congrats go out to our allies and friends, the British. Good job.
But hey, the good news (besides saving a bunch of money on my car insurance with Geico) is Paris did not get it. They are no doubt ready to blame the United States and President Bush in some kind of far-fetched (and wrongly perceived) conspiracy.
But a hearty congrats go out to our allies and friends, the British. Good job.
Tuesday, July 05, 2005
A Map You Need To See
If you are a member of the enlightened population, you already know this. But if you are a leftist who believes in appeasement, click on the title for a link to an important map. And take special note of the size of territory this area covers.
After viewing the map, ask yourself, what would happen if all nations in this vast region were to unite under one flag?
If you are Chinese, pay special attention to the areas in the western portion of your country.
If you are from Europe, note that the area is more than twice the size of your continent.
If you are Russia, be sure to compare the size of your country, with that of the area. Understand further that this area is very close to the size of your country, yet much more densely populated.
If you are American, just note all of these things.
After viewing the map, ask yourself, what would happen if all nations in this vast region were to unite under one flag?
If you are Chinese, pay special attention to the areas in the western portion of your country.
If you are from Europe, note that the area is more than twice the size of your continent.
If you are Russia, be sure to compare the size of your country, with that of the area. Understand further that this area is very close to the size of your country, yet much more densely populated.
If you are American, just note all of these things.
Fingers Crossed For New York
In spite of the fact it is a hotbed of modern day liberalism and has as its Senators, Schumer and Clinton; I truly hope NYC gets the bid for the Olympics. And though I hate every sports team they have, disagree with many NYers' opinions, they deserve it anyway.
They took the hardest casualties in the 9/11 attacks on liberty, freedom, and the American way of life. May it help heal the wounds.
Good Luck New York!!!!
They took the hardest casualties in the 9/11 attacks on liberty, freedom, and the American way of life. May it help heal the wounds.
Good Luck New York!!!!
Sen. Kennedy Slams President Bush's Pick For Supreme Court Justice
Click on the title for a good laugh.
It may be parody, but it isn't too far from the truth.
Hat Tip to QandO
It may be parody, but it isn't too far from the truth.
Hat Tip to QandO
Chirac Knows How To Win Friends And Influence People
McQ has a piece on Q and O about the some of the diplomatic methods that Chirac uses to make friends.
I read the story over the weekend and instead of getting upset, I just wrote it off as comments from a French politician that has been nothing more than an enormous failure, even by French standards. Chirac is through and now we are seeing a certain bitterness that one sees in a jilted lover. He is a lame duck and he knows it.
Click on the title for the McQ piece. It's short, but it echoes my sentiments exactly..
I read the story over the weekend and instead of getting upset, I just wrote it off as comments from a French politician that has been nothing more than an enormous failure, even by French standards. Chirac is through and now we are seeing a certain bitterness that one sees in a jilted lover. He is a lame duck and he knows it.
Click on the title for the McQ piece. It's short, but it echoes my sentiments exactly..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)