"Scientists have an independent obligation to respect and present the truth as they see it," Al Gore sensibly asserts in his film "An Inconvenient Truth"..
..With that outlook in mind, what do world climate experts actually think about the science of his movie?
This ought to be good.
Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, in Australia gives what, for many Canadians, is a surprising assessment: "Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."
(Emphasis is mine)
Well, that pretty much sums it up. You can read the rest, if you want.
The trouble is, there are countless other scientists that are of the same opinion. Yet, they rarely (if ever) get an audience with the MSM. They saturate us with the threat of global warming and anything that would point us in that direction. They focus on one side of the argument. They don't want you to form an informed opinion, they will tell you what you need to know.
How arrogant is that?
Let me modify Al's opening statement:
The media has an independent obligation to respect and present the truth as they see it.