Monday, April 13, 2009

Bravery On The High Seas

I stated in earlier posts after the election that Barack Obama would get a fair shake here at PYY, much fairer than the Left gave to GWB. But this doesn't mean I cannot criticize him and if you've read this blog with any regularity, you'll know that I've been highly critical on most of what we've seen from his administration, so far.

Naturally, if it's fair to argue against the bonehead policies and interventions assumed so far, it's also fair to give praise, when actions and implementations warrant it. This is but one moment, where a good job was done.

From the outcome, we can ascertain that this was handled well. There was no politicizing of this situation. The President's people were tight-lipped, as they should have been. They knew the situation and Obama had the guts to give the Navy authorization to execute the operation, as they saw fit. As an inexperienced Commander in Chief, he wisely allowed those who knew what they were doing, to do it without micromanagement.

We can surmise that time was getting short. The pirates and their hostage were out on the sea for quite awhile in just a lifeboat. Essentials (like drinking water) were probably getting scarce and the opportunity for action was becoming a shrinking window, by the hour. Add to this the imminent danger to the Captain and we have the makings of one of those split decisions that you cannot get back, once made,

As this story unfolded, I was only privy to the information available through the media. I didn't have any inside knowledge of anything, I just had my intuition. And like many, I probably would have acted a bit sooner with just as much authority, strength, and determination. But allowing the pirates to weary in the elements for a little while had its value, and in the aftermath shows that it was the wisest thing to do.

It will be interesting to see how future events like this are handled. We know that there will be future acts of piracy, because there many more out there just lurking and waiting for a victim. It's what they do for a living. The pirates have already sworn revenge and we must take them at their word.

So let's not kid ourselves here. We will have to be ready for some measure of retaliation. They will see this as a challenge and will most certainly up the ante next time. If I were the Administration, I would not hesitate to show others who are part of this discipline of criminals a thing or two. I would let them know rather swiftly, what is at stake if this kind of thing continues.

At this juncture in time, this kind of thing is merely a distraction from other more important issues. Right now, it's just a pesky fly that could cause us to not pay attention to those other issues. And it's one that must be swatted down. But if left unchecked, it will become a larger problem that will take more resources than what may be prudently available.

After all is said and done, the Captain who was held captive by these thugs is the real hero. At least to the crew of his ship, he is. Volunteering to be taken so that his crew could be left alone is an act of bravery, from an individual that represents what this country used to be all about. Not enough can be said about this man and I doubt that there are many like him left in the world.


15 comments:

Chuck said...

Actually the crew of the ship is calling out Obama to do something about this on Fox this morning.

L'Amerloque said...

Hi LAS !


As usual, Amerloque observes, and, metaphorically speaking, shakes his head in some frustration. In summary:


The President as CIC did his duty.

The USN commander on the spot did his duty.

The three SEAL snipers did their duty.


There is indeed merit, yet no more was sought or expected. Amerloque says ‘bravo’ ... while hoping that the media hoopla doesn’t get out of hand. They all did their jobs, fortunately - there was nothing special.


The nation needs heroes in these times filled with bad news, so the media will have a field day, probably even more than they had with the pilot who landed safely in the Hudson River (which was indeed an exceptional act).


Naturally the naysayers, belittlers and denigrators haven’t lost any time …


/// US rescue threatens lives of other pirate hostages, say experts

The dramatic rescue of an American cargo ship captain kidnapped by Somali pirates may have put the lives of hundreds of other hostages in danger and raised the stakes for future hijacks, experts have warned. …/… /// http://tinyurl.com/da83le

(sigh)


Best,
L’Amerloque

Greg said...

Naturally the naysayers, belittlers and denigrators haven’t lost any time ….

It's amazing, isn't it? What's the alternative? Pay off the pirates so that they know they won't be harmed while they reap millions of dollars? Is that good for the people who man these shipping vessels?

I hate 0bama. He sucks. But at least he's killing pirates and terrorists. That's one good thing. On the other hand, he didn't order an assault. He just said it was okay to shoot if the captain was in imminent danger. So, let's not go overboard in praise. Today, he'll probably be talking about a stimulus package for the pirates....

Anonymous said...

I think Admiral Gortney is correct to suggest, as stated in a recent AP article, that this piracy issue is far from over; maritime nations have ignored piracy on the horn of Africa and in the South China Sea for far too long. You may recall the tragic story of the Mayaguez. As a Marine, I remain disgusted with the decision to leave three Marines behind to suffer their fate at the hands of the Khmer Rouge. Such behavior is not what being a Marine is all about; we don’t leave anyone behind.

Nevertheless, we seem not to have learned an important lesson: ignoring acts of piracy only encourages it, but we have to internalize a certain truth: the oceans are much too large, and no navy has inexhaustible resources. I’m not even sure Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, or Myanmar has much of a navy at all, much less the will to patrol their areas against piracy. I believe the solution is to arm the merchant marine, or redesign shipping lanes to avoid pirate activities. Even with the latter suggestion, pirates will simply rethink their operations, and with the number of ships they’ve already hijacked, it is only a matter of time before they begin using them to move their operations farther offshore. As to the former suggestion, I can honestly understand a hesitancy to do that on oil and LPG tankers. It is a subject suitable for the UN, but I cannot recall a recent UN solution to anything important.

The news reports tell us that the pirates are already holding a number of “captives,” principally from the Philippines, ransom unpaid. Yes, escalation is likely, but maritime nations have to step up to the plate. I don’t think the US should back off because other nationals are in danger.

One final opinion: why does it take “presidential authority” for the Navy to execute its traditional mission? If we once again return to micro managing our combat arms from the White House, then all I can say is expect failed operations ala LBJ and Jimmy Carter.

rocket said...

"At this juncture in time, this kind of thing is merely a distraction from other more important issues. Right now, it's just a pesky fly that could cause us to not pay attention to those other issues."

I don't agree. This is serious shit and could leave the door open to the "evil ones" interfering in this kind of action. Then things will get serious. The Pirates (and I don't mean Pittsburg) have already taken down a supertanker and if you watch the news and the special reports on this,you can understand that they have an organization in place. (See Dr. Bob Arnot)

Remember. We have to be right every time and they only have to be right once.

As for Obama.

You can criticize him for his domestic policy but let's not forget first and formost up to this moment his main concern is the United States of America.

The Eurotrash who thought Obama would come slinking up to them begging forgiveness on his knees can (how can I say... reward me with oral favors!)

He came to Europe a couple of weeks ago and looked the Euro leaders (Sarkozy included)in the face and said, Maybe we have seemed arrogant to you at times but you have institutionalized anti americanism. Links provided upon request! I had a major foreign policy mood swing on Obama at this moment.

Now as to the succes of this operation. Thank God! But there will be others that may not come out as successful but I've really got no problems saluting before heroism no matter how ephemeral it may turn out to be.

Hi Amerloque

The President as CIC did his duty.

The USN commander on the spot did his duty.

The three SEAL snipers did their duty.

You are absolutely right. But the order must come form the CIC and the buck will always stop with him.

"The nation needs heroes in these times filled with bad news,..."

I see nothing wrong with this. A systematically depressed nation in denial ends up being like France and ends up kidnapping managers. sigh!

Mustang

One final opinion: why does it take “presidential authority” for the Navy to execute its traditional mission? If we once again return to micro managing our combat arms from the White House, then all I can say is expect failed operations ala LBJ and Jimmy Carter.

Because you know very well where the buck stops! If not you have a military independant of executive power a real formula for political instability.

Anonymous said...

If not you have a military independent of executive power a real formula for political instability.

No one suggested any such thing. Our commissions read, "Reposing special trust and confidence in the patriotism, valor, fidelity, and abilities of ..." This suggests that the officer commanding a destroyer is able to evaluate and act in the best interests of the United States, consistent with the established policies of the United States, without having first to obtain permission from the commander in chief.

Ordinarily, the on-site commander will apprise his superior (an Admiral), and obtain permission to engage an enemy. You suggest that we want the on-the-scene commander to observe piracy in-progress and do nothing until someone wakes up the President. I fervently disagree. I do not want to see US forces command structure relegated to the roles of the old Soviet Union. If the president no longer has confidence in his exceedingly well-trained, mature, valorous field commanders, then change their commissions to reflect that lack of trust and confidence.

LA Sunset said...

//Actually the crew of the ship is calling out Obama to do something about this on Fox this morning.//Well, Chuck, it wouldn't be a bad idea.

LA Sunset said...

//The President as CIC did his duty.

The USN commander on the spot did his duty.

The three SEAL snipers did their duty.//
They all did, which is what we expect them to do. In fact, that's what we hired them to do. My reference to bravery in the post was more directed at the Captain. I think his actions were not required, nor expected. Many before this guy offered no resistance, this guy and his crew took a stand.

LA Sunset said...

//Today, he'll probably be talking about a stimulus package for the pirates....//Leave it to Greg to bring us back down to reality, leave to him to leave us discouraged and blue.

And Mustang calls ME a cynic.

;)

LA Sunset said...

//One final opinion: why does it take “presidential authority” for the Navy to execute its traditional mission? If we once again return to micro managing our combat arms from the White House, then all I can say is expect failed operations ala LBJ and Jimmy Carter.//One thing a person who wants to be president needs to understand, you cannot, nor should not, ever micromanage the military.

This is one instance, one event, one example of how Obama plans to act in the face of danger. He got it right this time. Believe me, I am not getting too overly excited here, except for the fact that the hostage is alive. (I am not happy that the bad guys are dead, but I am not unhappy either. They made their bed.)

LA Sunset said...

//I don't agree. This is serious shit and could leave the door open to the "evil ones" interfering in this kind of action.//That's okay, but I think it's a mere pittance compared to keeping a dirty bomb out of Manhattan or some other locale. I think it's small potatoes compared to onerous bastards that hijack planes, then fly them into buildings.

I don't want you to think that I don't think this is important. It is. But if it's handled correctly now, there's no reason to believe that the willingness to hijack ships will be as viable of a career, as it has been in times past.

A.C. McCloud said...

I applaud Obama for letting them operate as needed. I thank God it worked out for the Phillips family on Easter.

But are there not rules of engagement in that AficaCon region that wouldn't have required presidential authority? While I can see why the Admirals might want it as CYA if things go downhill while the president's out on the lawn petting BO they should be able to act.

Anywho, I still think Obama's decision to not mention the confrontation until after the dust settled was politically-motivated. It's doubtful Bush would have gotten away with it.

LA Sunset said...

//I still think Obama's decision to not mention the confrontation until after the dust settled was politically-motivated. It's doubtful Bush would have gotten away with it.//You know fully good and well they would have pressed Bush for a complete plan of operation, with timetable. And then criticized the hell out of him for not providing it.

rocket said...

LA

Now, everytime I go on your site. I get a virus warning.

LA Sunset said...

Rocket,

I cannot understand why. Blogger maintains the site. One morning recently I couldn't get on any Blogger site, it had a message that my computer was trying to send spam or something. But no other site had it and even Google wasn't affected. Haven't seen it since.